fbpx

Relationships & Family > Parenting

All Cases & Advocacy All Legislation & Policy All Press Releases All Resources & Publications

Filters

The number of entries will adjust as search terms and filters are added or removed.

Content Area

Outcome

State

Cases & Advocacy

Debra H. v. Janice R. Amicus

Debra H. and Janice R. were a same-sex couple living in New York who entered a Vermont civil union. After Janice gave birth to a child conceived through alternative insemination and the couple separated, Debra continued to visit the child regularly until Janice cut off contact when the child was four-and-a-half years old.

More

Cases & Advocacy

Smith v. Quale

Kim Smith and Maggie Quale had twins, using a friend’s boyfriend as a sperm donor, and raised them together for approximately six months before breaking up. After the break-up, Maggie severely limited contact between Kim and the twins. Kim then filed a parentage action in Santa Cruz County family court, asserting her parental rights and requesting joint custody. In 2010, Kim and Maggie were able to settle their case, in a resolution that recognizes both women as the legal parents of their twins.

More

Cases & Advocacy

Embry v. Ryan

Lara Embry (L.E.) and Kimberly Ryan (K.R.) are a female couple who had two children together in Washington. Each partner gave birth to one child, and each adopted her non-biological child through a second-parent adoption in Washington. The couple moved to Florida, and their relationship ended several years later. They entered into an agreement and successfully shared equal custody and visitation with both children until K.R. broke the agreement and refused contact between the children.

More

Cases & Advocacy

In re J.D.F. Amicus

T.L. and D.F., a lesbian couple, had a child together and entered into a court-approved joint custody agreement. Several years later, T.L. and D.F. separated and agreed to share custody. But in 2004, Ohio’s anti-LGBTQ constitutional amendment excluding same-sex couples from marriage was passed. D.F. began to prevent T.L. from seeing their child, arguing that the amendment invalidated their shared custody order.

More