Cases & Advocacy
Kerrigan v. Connecticut Department of Public Health Amicus
The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot exclude same-sex couples from marriage. The Court held that preventing same-sex couples from marrying is unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The Court also held that the state’s civil union system for same-sex couples was inherently unequal because civil unions do not provide the same dignity, stature, and respect as marriage.
MoreCases & Advocacy
In re J.D.F. Amicus
- Relationships & Family > Parenting
- Relationships & Family > Marriage & Relationships
- Relationships & Family > Reproductive Justice
T.L. and D.F., a lesbian couple, had a child together and entered into a court-approved joint custody agreement. Several years later, T.L. and D.F. separated and agreed to share custody. But in 2004, Ohio’s anti-LGBTQ constitutional amendment excluding same-sex couples from marriage was passed. D.F. began to prevent T.L. from seeing their child, arguing that the amendment invalidated their shared custody order.
MorePress & Media
California Supreme Court Grants Review in Prop 8 Legal Challenges
Press & Media
Letter to the Community
Press & Media
NO on Prop 8 Campaign Leaders Call on Community to Stand Together
Press & Media
Proposition 8 Vote Disappointing, Shows Great 8-Year Progress
Press & Media
California Will Continue to Honor Marriages of Same-Sex Couples Who Married Before the Possible Passage of Prop 8
Press & Media
Legal Groups File Lawsuit Challenging Proposition 8, Should It Pass
Press & Media
Statement by NO on Prop 8 Campaign on Election Status
Cases & Advocacy
In re Marriage Cases
NCLR was lead counsel on behalf of same-sex couples, Equality California, and Our Family Coalition. On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued a historic decision in In re Marriage Cases which challenged the constitutionality of state laws that discriminate against same-sex couples in marriage.
More