Cases & Advocacy
Burrows v. ILWU
Despite their long-term relationship and registration as domestic partners, the ILWU initially rejected Marvin Burrows’ claim for his partner William Swenor’s pension benefits. As a result, Burrows lost his home of 35 years and was financially destitute.
MoreCases & Advocacy
Griego v. Oliver
NCLR filed a lawsuit on behalf of couples Rose Griego and Kim Kiel, Miriam Rand and Ona Porter, A.D. Joplin and Greg Gomez, Therese Councilor and Tanya Struble, and Monica Leaming and Cecilia Taulbee who were denied marriage licenses by New Mexico’s Bernalillo County Clerk.
MorePress & Media
Joint Statement on Florida’s Path to Marriage Equality
Press & Media
Same-Sex Couples Ask New Mexico Supreme Court to Protect Their Right to Marry
Press & Media
NCLR Hails Historic Supreme Court Decisions Striking Down Federal Defense of Marriage Act and Restoring the Freedom to Marry in California
Press & Media
NCLR Responds to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Defense of Marriage Act Case
Press & Media
NCLR Responds to U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Proposition 8 Case
Press & Media
Same-Sex Couples File Lawsuit Seeking the Freedom to Marry in New Mexico
Legislation & Policy
Maryland Marriage Equality
Same-sex couples have been able to marry in Maryland since January 1, 2013. On March 1, 2012, Governor Martin O’Malley signed H.B. 438, a bill that allowed same-sex couples to marry. However, opponents gathered signatures to put a referendum that would have repealed the new law on the ballot. On November 6, 2012, the referendum did not pass. NCLR worked as part of a broad coalition to help pass the bill and defeat the referendum.
Even before this law went into effect, Maryland already recognized marriages between same-sex couples entered in other jurisdictions. On May 18, 2012, the Court of Appeals of Maryland (the state’s highest court), ruled in Port v. Cowan that Maryland must recognize an out-of-state marriage of a same-sex couple if the marriage was valid in the state where the couple married. Under the legal doctrine of “comity,” the court held that Maryland must recognize out-of-state marriages for purposes of divorce and for all other purposes, even if the couple could not have entered into the marriage within the state.
Information about relationship recognition in other states .
MorePress & Media